News and Views
- About IPF
- Is telomere length associated with survival in IPF?
- How can mortality risk be assessed in patients with IPF?
- Could periostin be a viable biomarker for IPF?
- Are acute exacerbations driven by cellular mechanisms?
- What are the outcomes of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in patients with IPF?
- How does the lung microbiome change during acute exacerbation?
- Diagnosing IPF
- Managing IPF
- How should cough be treated in patients with IPF?
- Should all patients with IPF be treated for GER?
- What do patients with IPF want in pulmonary rehab education?
- Should all patients with IPF be treated with antacid medications?
- Can exercise training impact outcomes in patients with IPF?
- Should patients with IPF undergo mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure?
- Is daily home spirometry an effective tool for detecting disease progression in IPF?
- About IPF
- Suggested Reading
Learn about prescription IPF treatment
Should All Patients with IPF Be Treated with Antiacid Medications?
In 2011, the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Association published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of IPF.1 Recently, these guidelines were updated based on new evidence reported since publication of the prior guidelines, and treatment recommendations were updated accordingly.2 Addressed specifically was the question, "Should patients with IPF be treated with antiacid medications?"
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is very common among patients with IPF, occurring in over 90% of patients, even in the absence of classical reflux symptoms.3 GER is a risk factor for aspiration and microaspiration, which could lead to pneumonitis.2 It is postulated that this could cause or worsen IPF. Accordingly, the risk for microaspiration-associated lung injury or damage may be decreased with the use of antiacid treatments, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 blocker receptor antagonists (H2RAs).
What They Did
Pertinent literature was obtained through a search strategy using medical subject heading keywords and text words.2 The Ovid platform was used to search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Affects for May 2010 through May 2014. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts to identify articles for full review and evaluated the full text of articles deemed potentially relevant by either reviewer. Results from identified studies with the same treatment agent were pooled, and meta-analyses were reviewed.
What They Found
A survival benefit for patients receiving antiacid medication (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.93; adjusted analysis) was suggested by 1 retrospective analysis of longitudinal cohorts.4 A separate aggregate analysis of 3 randomized, controlled trials of different pharmacologic therapies in patients with IPF examined all the patients who were randomized to the placebo groups. Researchers compared 124 patients receiving a PPI or H2RA at baseline (91% PPI, 9% H2RA) to 118 patients not receiving antiacid treatment and not receiving other study medications. For those receiving antiacid treatment at baseline, a significantly smaller decrease in forced vital capacity during the study period was found (mean difference, 0.07 L; 95% CI, 0-0.14; P=.05).5 Of note, in patients who received antiacid treatment, there were no episodes of adjudicated acute exacerbations compared with placebo. However, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization.
What It Means
Based on these data, the guidelines suggest that "clinicians use regular antiacid treatment for patients with IPF (conditional recommendation, very low confidence in estimates of effect)."2 In making this recommendation, the guidelines committee placed a higher value on possible improved lung function and survival and the low cost of therapy, and a lower value on the potential increased risk for pneumonia with antiacid therapy.
Link to abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177183
- Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:788-824.
- Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, et al. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:e3-e19.
- Tobin RW, Pope CE, Pellegrini CA, et al. Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1804-1808.
- Lee JS, Ryu JH, Elicker BM, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux therapy is associated with longer survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:1390-1394.
- Lee JS, Collard HR, Anstrom KJ, et al. Anti-acid treatment and disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis of data from three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:369-376.